Comments on: File Post 6 – Government Corruption

By: Jaqueline F

Jaqueline F — Tue, 31 Dec 2013 17:28:43 +0000

It is our point of reference in how we conduct our actions often changes our viewpoint. Sometimes this change is good and sometimes this alteration is bad but it is our viewpoint that influences over what we see.

By: dmtspice

dmtspice — Wed, 12 Dec 2012 03:38:50 +0000

After you crack down on government corruption in Beliz, can you take a stab at the bigger problem of government corruption in the good ol’ US of A?

By: factchecker

factchecker — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:35:43 +0000

I meant to say “there is stronger evidence in favor of John and against the Belizean corruption than this one sentence”…

By: factchecker

factchecker — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 16:33:37 +0000

Be careful about interpreting this sentence: “I learned about the killing of the dogs on a Friday.” — To my ears (I’m not a native English speaker!) This could mean both:
(a) “I learned on a Friday about the killing of the dogs”
as well as
(b) “I learned about the killing of the dogs having happened on a Friday”.
– There is strong evidence in favor of John and against the Belizean corruption than this one sentence with a double meaning….

By: SL

SL — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 08:59:47 +0000

Actually if Jeff Wise is telling the truth…. That is a leap of faith right there.
.
It is well known and well documented that Jeff Wise has contempt for John McAfee. He does not report about him objectively and every chance he gets, he tries to ridicule him.
.
Who do you think has made the biggest noise about bath salts and the young women?

By: Paul Bear

Paul Bear — Tue, 11 Dec 2012 05:21:54 +0000

Actually, Harold, if Jeff Wise is telling the truth in a recent article I read, then the Belize government IS pointing fingers, because he said that a police officer from Belize sent him a note saying they thought Jeff might be interested that a murder had occurred, and that McAfee was their “prime suspect”… exact words Jeff uses in recent article. Thought you should know.

By: Nate

Nate — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 23:12:53 +0000

Here’s some interesting information. Yesterday, in Jeff Wise’s hit piece on John in the New York Times, Jeff writes:
“when I received a curt e-mail from a police official in Belize on Nov. 11, “It may interest you to know that there was a murder yesterday in San Pedro Town, Ambergris Caye and McAfee is the prime suspect.”

So, the Belize police were contacting the media, knowing exactly who to reach out to immediately after the murder preparing the press with the narrative of John as prime suspect and murderer. This has set up painted all over it.

By: lanikino

lanikino — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:38:41 +0000

since your comment appears under mine….

I fully realize the state of this blog and the owners RIGHT to do whatever he wants, as I have spoken to it earlier in a comment specific to loose_cannon further up on this page and with personal support for john.

So please, before you assume anything….

The suggestion is, if possible, to only close comments on posts that are intended to be taken down anyway. That way comments, perspectives, links and history do not disappear.

It forces comments to the next “open” post.
It was a suggestion and a suggestion only, as I read through frustrations of owners/moderators and posters here. Hell, he might not want to. Or can.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 19:35:48 +0000

Regardless of when the authorities found out, why on earth would John report the poisonings to the authorities (let the authorities handle the situation) and then immediately afterwards murder Mr. Faull (deal with the situation on his own). If he intended to deal with the situation himself he would not have had Mr. Mulligan file the report on Saturday. That would obviously set up a motive that would place him as the prime suspect. Just doesn’t make sense.

By: ron

ron — Mon, 10 Dec 2012 18:54:53 +0000

If your own freedom (maybe forever) was on the line, YOU would control the narrative completely. One of my peeves is that netizens seem to think private blogs are public message centers, and that they have the “right” to put anything on them. No, they don’t! JM will cull this forum in order to present a reasonable picture of the chain of events, journaled by himself, with the insight of the readers/posters. That’s what I would expect. Meanwhile, he should shed quite a few more posts that make navigation of this material difficult, and that include a few of my OWN posts, some made from the perspective of the clown that lives in me.