我曾错误地指责杰夫·怀斯的不当行为，在申报之旅，他向我飞行在新墨西哥的牧场. 我终于收到从该行的照片，并要发布, 当我看着他们, 我的恐惧, 这是一个不同的记者 (他的名字我显然不会释放) 从不同的杂志, 在不同的行程. 我希望我能原谅自己的事实，我做了数十次采访，并出现在许多杂志在我的飞行时间在新墨西哥州, 可以预期被混淆, 但就是没有任何借口. 杰夫的行甚至不包括篝火会议.
我错了. 我道歉. 我知道这不利于, 但我真的很抱歉.
编辑后记:
至于谁发现照片中的君子, 我提供的这个回应，我给这篇文章的评论:
约翰·迈克菲 上 说:
我的令人发指的错误，尽管杰夫描绘了一幅画面？自己差远了, 在多篇文章，跨越了两年多. 在所有的诚意事件露营之旅 (错误杰夫), 可能解释他的斗牛犬的方法来嗅探出我的生活，我能记得的唯一事件. 既然我是错了, 我什至不能猜测什么扭曲的动机，这名男子移动. 我的错误我的“恐怖”, 是君子谁, 现在, 消除过程, 自己可能已经强迫出柜. 那绅士对待我还算是一个真正体面的人. 如果他正在读, 请知道我我的头挂在耻辱.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
我的三个朋友仍被关押在监狱里捏造罪名. 它们是:
埃迪·安科纳:
卡西安查瓦里亚:
威廉·穆里根:
他们被指控，并已被监禁，因为三个合法授权的枪支被发现在不正确的房间我的财产 (拉伸法发挥到了极致). 我想请你，请电邮以下，并要求他们释放:
| [email protected] | |
| james.scott @ radisson.com | |
| [email protected] | |
| audrey.wallace @ opm.gov.bz | |
| [email protected] | |
| [email protected] | |
| [email protected] | |
| joseph.waight @ mof.gov.bz |
pingback的: 从恶意软件疯狂: 约翰McAfee的狂欢精神错乱简史 | 数字化趋势
pingback的: 如何信任副LED约翰·迈克菲的陨落 - NLP
pingback的: 如何信任副LED约翰·迈克菲的陨落
十一月 28, 2012 在 5:08 上
我希望得到的响应约翰. ü我想通了，还是不?
十一月 28, 2012 在 5:03 上
约翰是不是一个疯子, 他其实是相当聪明. 他想出了一种方法，使数百万做的东西，他显然喜欢. “写作 “. 他使用的是我们的国家, 伯利兹作为他的游乐场. 我们了解到总理议员奥利弗·达罗院长给了他更多的收视率，当他发现有必要在电视上直呼. McAfee是清楚地知道，我们的警察和我们的人民负责检控违例者缺乏能力判定某人有时甚至目击者. 无论如何, 削减长话短说, McAfee将很快可以在动作惊悚电影盯着和销售数百万册图书，他会写他的狗命和他的经验，而生活在一个小thirdworld国家在加勒比海地区时，他是一名谋杀嫌疑犯
十一月 27, 2012 在 8:48 下午
嗨，约翰 – 你必须摆脱现在的伯利兹! 有熟悉的知识，采空区和伯利兹文化, 你站在那里没有机会. 我知道说起来容易做起来难, 但你必须得到美国尽快. 它必须是通过不定期的海上或空中运输. 海是最安全的，你必须保持在国际水域，直到你在美国水域. 是, 我知道采空区和美国政府是如何接近，但在美国，你站在一个更好的机会. 认为…有一个被捆绑和销售了几年的包机帆船. 或类似的东西能否成行.
十一月 27, 2012 在 4:25 下午
嘿，约翰, 我也一直在运行上与我的父亲，谁是草率通过 “审讯” 如果u可以把它称为，对在新墨西哥州坐在贪婪. 在审讯过程中，他被诊断患有结肠癌，看到他要通过腐败法官和系统被埋没，因此他出逃了，我选择和他在一起，帮助照顾他，在此期间，. 他最终通过，我浮出水面. 我花了40万美元，以清除我的名字和避免监狱为窝藏. 我希望ü，我祈祷，为你的安全. 这是没有乐趣U R现在做. 害怕噪声和每一个眼神每一天的每一分钟…ü已发现或确认. 排队的律师. 总有一天它将结束. 我最好的.
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:59 下午
肯定是光明的工作
十一月 27, 2012 在 2:34 上
LOL! B-)
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:50 下午
如果你花足够的时间在第三世界国家, 你要最终属性抹黑运动，以错误的动机和得到左窥探真正的问题, 一种无形的威胁似乎藐视法律关系和情感的物理. 偏执是像呼吸. 在一遍又一遍做几个月就结束, 它开始感到繁琐的, 但它是必要的，为了生存在一个世界里，我们被包围在看不见的威胁难以想象的动机推动字符刺杀amiright?
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:39 下午
我们都得到偏执，有时和关联抹黑与错误知觉的动机，然后现在. 偏执是像呼吸. 每天做几个月就结束后，开始觉得乏味的, 但它只是你必须做的那些事之一.
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:33 下午
人们往往集中在他们居住的地方. 约翰住在伯利兹, 所以他并没有真正解决世界的欲望. 他也正在伯利兹政府迫害, 所以那种定义他现在的重点. 拯救世界的是一个高大的顺序，但一个人约翰的人才可能是可行的节能伯利兹. Belize is a very small country with very basic infrastructure. I wouldn’t mind going to Belize on vacation after it gets liberated from John’s enemies. Sounds like a colorful and adventurous place to live when you are not on the receiving end of all the corruption.
十一月 26, 2012 在 11:20 下午
Sorry you took me seriously. 这是一个玩笑. Human nature makes true world autonomy virtually impossible. Everybody lies.
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:06 下午
Everything in the media is a biased mess. In the US, politicians just need to spew some crap about weapons of mass destruction and everyone starts running around printing it like it was the gospel truth. Britain even fired the head of the BBC because he would not tow the line with the manufacturing of consent for the war with Iraq. Reporters now are just shills for corporations, 政府, and special interest groups. John would be lucky to find a decent one to take on his story in a real way. No surprise that he got some sensationalist idiots who acted like teenagers at a spring break party in Guadalajara and went to town on drugs, 性别, and guns instead of concentrating on what he was trying to tell them. If they wanted to sell copy, they could have at least done half and half but these guys did not even do that. Basically they were just down in Belize on vacation and wrote some easy garbage that they knew would sell.
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:48 下午
The media these days is just programmed to sensationalize things. Reporters would rather get an easy story about a madcap gun toting millionaire than having to investigate, on their own, the deep underbelly of corruption in a third world country. That is too scary for them. What passes for journalism in today’s world is crappy human interest stories and biased verbiage gleaned from other people. The reporter who actually suffers and gets into the real dirt of things may endanger his or her own life. That is why you get a media filled with MTV type clownery.
John apparently has quite a story to tell and the fact that no US journalist could focus on the facts of the story is astounding but tells me that the US is way too far gone into the wormhole of MTV and Facebook realities to be serious about investigative reporting anymore. Shows like 60 Minutes are the exceptions rather than the rule nowadays. John apologized for his mistake but I am not all that sure it was even necessary. The reporter obviously is a jerk and doesn’t know how to tie together a decent story that remains true to the subject matter.
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:04 下午
Let’s put the challenge out there to the mainstream media to do a documentary about crime and corruption in Belize. Interview people who have lived there, and talk to the people in the streets about the things the tourist brochures never mention.
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:07 下午
I have an idea. Let’s each take a country &report on all of the corruption & bad governing & 犯罪 & general badness. Then we can all together undo the evils of the world. That way we won’t just be helping Belize, but every country & all the people. 哦, and we have to go after all of the drug dealers, because I think they’re behind it all. World autonomy. Anybody interested?
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:09 下午
I think yo did it!
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:05 下午
I am just reading this whole blog from up in Canada and it is blowing my mind. Belize sounds out of control. I wouldn’t worry about some little tiff with a bad reporter. You have lots of other fish to fry, it sounds like. The guy dissed you from the beginning anyways. Bad about the other dude, but you need to concentrate on staying alive and get the message out there. You are doing a great job so far. You have me on the edge of my seat, so keep up the good work and don’t let little stuff take you away from your focus. Stay clear and alert and keep the story going!
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:34 下午
If you read the book “Bad Medicine” by Judge John Reilly you will also get the distinct feeling that Canada is out of control. There is also the infamous Colonel Russel Williams convicted serial killer. Corruption happens everywhere, even in Canada eh!
十一月 26, 2012 在 9:25 下午
Never read Bad Medicine so I can’t speak to that.There is corruption everywhere but what is even worse up here are all the taxes. Who wouldn’t want to be like John if they had some money? I would get the hell out of here in a heartbeat if I had the dough.I admire his search for freedom in a tropical paradise. 但, after reading all of this, I doubt I would go to Belize. Unless John can straighten out the mess there. Belize will be a no-go zone on a lot of people’s lists.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:59 下午
I can’t say that I feel all that much sympathy for the reporter in question but an error is an error. A public apology should suffice in this case. To prolong everything with bitter recrimination and animosity probably won’t lead to anything better. John made a mistake. John is a human being— that’s what we do much of the time. The key is that he dealt with it in a fair way and felt remorse. Many people see John as a larger than life tycoon and forget that he is just a human being with all of our weaknesses and foibles.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:48 下午
Everyone can make a mistake but it takes a good man to admit to it. 也, being 67 and on the run with armed people after you, while creating a magnificent blog with all this material on it, really is a decent enough excuse for anyone to have trouble remembering all the details of everything. Don’t take it hard on yourself, 男人. The guy will get over it. Trying to do a thousand things at once while on the run is not easy. Get some rest and have a candlelight dinner with Sam of souffle iguana or whatever it is that people on the lam in Belize eat.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:39 下午
John is man enough to admit to a mistake on a public forum read by hundreds of thousands of people. That says a lot about him as a person. If everyone who made a mistake was honorable enough to admit to it and own up to their errors, the world would be a lot better place.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:07 下午
I don’t know why those reporters did not just get the real story about John’s life and had to invent a whole alternate reality to sell copy. If they had investigated Belize a little bit more and spent less time looking for ways to portray John as a drugged out psychopath, it might have boded better for their eventual careers. The real story confirms that the truth is often stranger than fiction.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:46 下午
大体, the majority of “新闻” and press reporting these days is all about sensationalism, and is not very concerned with classic fair, impartial reporting of true facts. What once was negatively referred to as yellow journalism/muckraking has now become a widely accepted norm by most “新闻” agencies. The advent of the internet, and the concept that anybody with an opinion, or personal agenda, can post a op-ed and claim it to be a credible report, has only further eroded the standards of news reporting. It doesn’t help that the general public has shown a willingness to accept unethical reporting as a primary source of news, so there’s no real motivation for the media to reform.
Please note that I am in no way referencing any particular agency or reporter related to Mr. McAfee’s saga, but merely sharing my view on why news reports seemingly cannot be taken at face value anymore.
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:07 下午
詹姆斯,
Sadly the (Western) mainstream press is no longer interested in journalism in the slightest. The only the that matters is distribution. It all boils down to readership or viewer numbers.
Being based in the UK, I often catch the news over breakfast or whilst driving to work. It is now very rare for a day to pass without hearing a (英国广播公司) presenter state: “Later today {Insert MP/Minster Name here} will give a speech and say that…{insert nonsense of your choice here}”.
In their desire to “get their story across”, political parties have taken to cosying up to reporters and offering them stories. Over time this has resulted in an entire generation of journalists for whom “调查” means something that the police do.
It is very, very rare to find a tough, resourceful and principled journalist these days. So I understand why you might be confused about the apparent laziness of (most) 记者, but the sad truth is that we helped make them that way: by allowing the politicians to buy them out, and then continuing to read/click/absorb the duly peddled clap-trap.
Result? The string-pullers (those really in power, not the puppets) can do pretty much what they want, because they have the ability to “manage the news”. It rather reminds me of that line from “Good Morning, Vietnam”, where the broadcaster (played by Robin Williams) announced: “Dit, dit dit, dah, dah dah. Here is the news. All the news that’s new and approved by the US Army, the *sweetest*-smelling army in the world…” 无独有偶, he was waging a one-man campaign to get “真相” told as well…
I am actually surprised that you’re surprised. Must be the cynic in me!
十一月 26, 2012 在 11:13 下午
How do you know that the “real story” is real? Smoke & 镜子.
十一月 27, 2012 在 12:07 上
好, we don’t know that the “real story” 是 100% real because we don’t have an independently verified account of what’s happened. It’s hard to get that on any story IMHO, but I fully appreciate your point
Possibly, that’s why I find this situation so captivating…everyone forms their opinion in the absence of “perfect” information. What we each base our opinion on may be very different (even with the same outcome) but likely includes our personal values towards both our own liberty and that of others; identification with political corruption as a worthy cause to fight against; our experiences of travel, or simply life in general, within countries such as Belize; our tendency to dismiss things we have not directly experienced as “疯狂的”, “偏执” or untruthful; our interpretation of information relating to John which we may feel renders his account more or less credible including previous media coverage, employment track record, his personal responses on this blog (both tone and content), other forum activities; what we see as the most relevant key to (or point of) 在 “real story”…and so much more.
That’s what makes it interesting for me. I personally believe there is a vast amount of truth in what has been shared here…but that’s just my opinion.
I agree with your smoke and mirrors comment…just that a lot of the smoke and mirrors comes from within each of us too, if that makes any sense.
十一月 26, 2012 在 6:41 下午
Wrong article or not, Jeff has painted a terrible picture of you in most peoples eyes.
Most reporters have actually.. I cant even tell you how many “WANTED FOR MURDER” articles I read..
It seems in that business, I suppose it’s all about getting “clicks” on your story..
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:11 下午
And John has painted a terrible picture of Jeff repeatedly on this blog, something that many readers will never, especially subconsciously, ever forget. A good example of this is your continuing to disparage his name & 声誉. 什么乱七八糟的 & a complete shame. This is his livelihood & John McAfee is only a very small part of his reporting. Please stop the witch hunt.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:41 下午
“A good example of this is your continuing to disparage his name & 声誉”
How so, 先生?
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:51 下午
By once again stating that Jeff has painted a terrible picture of John in the media. As John has often stated, one’s reality is often quite different than another’s. Some believe all of what John is true, some believe the Press, some are little of both, & others take it all with a grain of salt. 我, 一, need more than just somebody’s saying so, including John, to accept it as the truth.
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:52 下午
This keyboard auto corrects, so just please use mental editing!
十一月 26, 2012 在 7:52 下午
My heinous error notwithsdanding, Jeff has painted a far worse picture of myself, 在多篇文章，跨越了两年多. In all sincerety, the events on the camping trip (错误杰夫), 可能解释他的斗牛犬的方法来嗅探出我的生活，我能记得的唯一事件. 既然我是错了, 我什至不能猜测什么扭曲的动机，这名男子移动. 我的 “horror” at my mistake, 是君子谁, 现在, 消除过程, 自己可能已经强迫出柜. 那绅士对待我还算是一个真正体面的人. 如果他正在读, 请知道我我的头挂在耻辱.
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:06 下午
John I don’t know if your reply was towards me directly but I was just quoting an above poster who said: “A good example of this is your continuing to disparage his name & reputation”
I’m not sure, but I think he was talking to me!?
I don’t know what I have ever really said bad about Jeff other than “misleading headlines” or him “portraying you in a negative way via his articles he has written”…
Other than that I’m kinda at a loss as to what “亚历克斯” is talking about…
十一月 26, 2012 在 8:08 下午
My comments loaded late I guess. I see who you were responding to John.
Disregard my previous comment.
十一月 27, 2012 在 4:00 上
Regarding your confusion about what Alex is saying, it basically amounts to this: There are two sides to the coin. From the perspective of John’s supporters, Jeff has stated nothing but lies and painted John as a complete nut. From the perspective of Jeff’s supporters, John is a nutcase and the articles were fairly reported and now he’s being painted as a liar and shoddy journalist by John & some posters on this site.
注意, I am neutral in this feud; I’m merely trying to explain what this poster was saying, make it even more obvious.